Legal Opinion

Windigo Mills v. Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 1, 1979No. Civ. 4002PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FRANSON, J.

Statement of the Case

This appeal is from a judgment granting a writ of administrative mandate pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5. By the writ the trial court ordered appellant, the California Unemployment Insurance Board (hereinafter Board), to set aside its decision that certain employees who had participated in a strike against respondent Windigo Mills (hereinafter Windigo) were eligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits.

The employees’ applications for unemployment benefits were originally denied by the Employment Development Department on the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Moran v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Dare v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Thomas v. California Employment Stabilization CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Isobe v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Elkins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Interstate Brands v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Voices of the Wetlands v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Kulshrestha v. First Union Commercial Corp.California Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Cadiz Land Co., Inc. v. Rail Cycle, LPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API