Legal Opinion

Allen v. Cal. Mut. Bldg & Loan Ass'n

California Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1943No. S. F. 16873PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

So far as the merits of the controversy are concerned, Allen and those who in the superior court established their right to share in the assets of California Mutual Building and Loan Association, are in the same position as the investors whose judgment against that now insolvent corporation was affirmed in Alexander v. State Capital *479Co., 9 Cal.2d 304 [70 P.2d 619]. The association and the Building and Loan Commissioner, in appealing from the judgment rendered against them, do not deny that, by fraudulent representations, the respondents were induced to exchange their investment certificates…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Sutphin v. SpeikCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Archer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Price v. Sixth District Agricultural Assn.California Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Tally v. GanahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Davies v. KrasnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Sears v. RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Stockton Theatres, Inc. v. PalermoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Mobbs v. City of LehighSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API