Allen v. Cal. Mut. Bldg & Loan Ass'n
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
So far as the merits of the controversy are concerned, Allen and those who in the superior court established their right to share in the assets of California Mutual Building and Loan Association, are in the same position as the investors whose judgment against that now insolvent corporation was affirmed in Alexander v. State Capital *479Co., 9 Cal.2d 304 [70 P.2d 619]. The association and the Building and Loan Commissioner, in appealing from the judgment rendered against them, do not deny that, by fraudulent representations, the respondents were induced to exchange their investment certificates…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Sutphin v. SpeikCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Archer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Price v. Sixth District Agricultural Assn.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Tally v. GanahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Davies v. KrasnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Sears v. RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Stockton Theatres, Inc. v. PalermoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Mobbs v. City of LehighSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.