Legal Opinion

California Credit & Collection Corp. v. Randall

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 27, 1926No. Docket No. 2956PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover on a promissory note, payable six months after date, given by the defendant to the Virden Packing Company, a corporation, and by that company assigned, after maturity, to the plaintiff for collection. The defendant entered into an agreement with the packing company to purchase ten shares of its capital stock at $100 a share, the par value thereof. He paid $250 on the purchase price and gave the note in suit for the remainder thereof. The agreement contained the following provisions: “It is expressly agreed that no stock is to be issued…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of CoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Toby v. Oregon Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Munson v. FishburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Field v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Mooney v. CyriacksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. California Credit & Collection Corp. v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  2. LeClercq v. MichaelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Wiberg v. BarnumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Blackwell v. ThomassonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. California Credit Collection Corporation v. MooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API