Wiberg v. Barnum
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.
In December, 1923, appellant entered into a contract in writing by the terms and provisions of which she agreed to purchase from the defendants certain real property therein described, situated in Los Angeles County. Thereafter, and in June, 1924, she notified them of her rescission of said contract, reciting in detail various grounds of fraud through which she alleged the contract to have been procured, and demanded a return of the amount theretofore paid on account of the agreed purchase. A suit for rescission was subsequently instituted, wherein judgment was rendered in favor of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- People v. StitesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Davis v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- White v. HendleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Browne v. San Gabriel River Rock Co.California Court of Appeal · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Boulevard Land Co. v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Oak Industries, Inc. v. Foxboro Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1984
- Blake v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1938
- Municipio de Aguas Buenas v. de la FuenteSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1940
- Poggetto v. BowenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.