Legal Opinion

LeClercq v. Michael

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 19, 1948No. Civ. 16591PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.

This is an appeal by defendants from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs decreeing the foreclosure of a chattel mortgage executed by defendants on the furniture and fixtures of a restaurant.

Plaintiffs, who are mother and son, were the owners and operators of a restaurant known as “Mother LaClair’s Chicken Pie Shop. ’’ They listed the business for sale with a broker and in June, 1945, defendants called at the restaurant as prospective purchasers and talked with plaintiff Armand LeClercq. During the conversation, in response to an inquiry as to why he wanted to sell the business, Armand stated it…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ruhl v. MottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Davis v. Rite-Lite Sales Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Cross v. MayoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. J. I. Case Threshing MacHine Co. v. Copren Bros.California Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. California Credit & Collection Corp. v. RandallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. First Advantage Background Services Corp. v. Private Eyes, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2008
  2. Squire's Department Store, Inc. v. DudumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Alton v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Gedstad v. EllichmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Akin v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's LondonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API