Blackwell v. Thomasson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
McLUCAS, J., pro tem.
Plaintiff brought suit for the recovery of moneys paid under a sale contract for the purchase of an automobile. Defendant appeals from a judgment rendered for plaintiff in the sum of $275.
Plaintiff testified that he saw an advertisement of the defendant guaranteeing a new car for ninety days; that he called on the defendant and the automobile was shown to him by a salesman, who said to him: “We guarantee the car for ninety days; you have got the advertisement in your hands and we stand by our guarantee. We give you a written guarantee also with that.” That he agreed to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mooney v. CyriacksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Whiting v. SquegliaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Van Natta v. HeywoodUtah Supreme Court · 1920
- California Credit & Collection Corp. v. RandallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Odson v. SwansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
3Cited by3 opinions
- Simmons v. Ratterree Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
- Baylies v. Vanden BoomWyoming Supreme Court · 1929
- Darrow v. HoulihanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928