Mooney v. Cyriacks
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Frederick H. Griffith and Ernest C. Griffith for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtLawlor, J.
This is an appeal by the defendant, F. R. Cyriacks, from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, Mary E. Mooney, in an action for the rescission of a written agreement of sale, on the ground of fraud, for the purchase and sale of an automobile, and to recover the sum of $532.15, alleged to have been paid out by plaintiff on account of said agreement of sale. The case was tried by the court sitting without a jury, and findings of fact and conclusions of law were made. A motion for a new trial was interposed and denied. The defendant appeals.
Respondent and appellant, the latter represented by J. H.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Farnsworth v. DuffnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Newman v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Johnson v. PowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- J. I. Case Threshing MacH. Co. v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Maxson v. LlewelynCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Tahoe National Bank v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Riverisland Cold Storage, Inc. v. Fresno-Madera Production Credit Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- Continental Airlines, Inc. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- Ferguson v. KochCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Rothstein v. Janss Investment Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1941
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.