Legal Opinion

Kryzer v. Champlin American Legion No. 600

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 24, 1992No. C5-91-1396PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COYNE, Justice.

On review of a decision of the court of appeals reversing judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint for failure to state a cause of action pursuant to the Minnesota Civil Damage Act, Minn.Stat. § 340A.801, subd. 1 (1990), we reaffirm the necessity for a direct causal relationship between the intoxication and the injury and reverse the decision of the court of appeals. Kryzer v. Champlin American Legion No. 600, 481 N.W.2d 98 (Minn.App.1992).

Dale Kryzer’s complaint alleges only that Champlin American Legion No. 600 “illegally sold and bartered intoxicating liquor to Linda Kryzer…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Northern States Power Co. v. FranklinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  2. Flom v. FlomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. Hahn v. City of OrtonvilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  4. Medved v. DoolittleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  5. Strand v. Village of WatsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Osborne v. Twin Town Bowl, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  2. Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
  3. Harpster v. HetheringtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  4. State v. BoettcherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
  5. Bryan v. KissoonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API