Legal Opinion

Strand v. Village of Watson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 28, 1955No. 36,496, 36,502PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Knutson, Justice.

This case arises out of a collision between an automobile driven by plaintiff and one driven by one Eaymond H. Martinson. The proven facts are not seriously in dispute. The inferences which properly can be drawn from the proven facts and circumstances surrounding the activities of Martinson give rise to the main differences of opinion between the parties. From the record it reasonably may be said that the following facts could be found by the jury.

The city of Montevideo, in Chippewa County, maintains a municipal liquor store, as does defendant, Village of Watson, which lies…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Beck v. GroeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. State v. SaporenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  3. Hahn v. City of OrtonvilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  4. Selover v. BryantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  5. State v. Alexander GrahamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Trail v. ChristianSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  2. McGuire v. C & L RESTAURANT INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Village of Brooten, a Municipal Corporation v. Cudahy Packing Company, a Corporation, and the Travelers Indemnity Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
  4. Farmers Mutual Automobile Insurance v. GastWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Parsons Ex Rel. Parsons v. JowWyoming Supreme Court · 1971

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API