Legal Opinion

Flom v. Flom

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 25, 1980No. 49562, 49582PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KELLY, Justice.

Plaintiff, who sustained injuries in a fall from a manually operated merry-go-round in a public park, brought a negligence action against her husband, who was pushing the merry-go-round at the time, and the city that owned the park. After a trial the jury apportioned causal negligence 55 percent to the husband, 35 percent to the city, and 10 percent to the plaintiff and awarded damages. The trial judge ordered judgment on the jury findings and denied defendants’ motions for a new trial or judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Both defendants appeal from the judgment,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Peterson v. BalachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  2. Johnson v. EvanskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  3. Medved v. DoolittleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  4. Hartmon v. National Heater Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  5. LaValle v. Aqualand Pool Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Lubbers v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  2. Ponticas v. K.M.S. InvestmentsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Domagala v. RollandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  4. Hauenstein v. Loctite Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Canada by and Through Landy v. McCarthySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API