Legal Opinion

Harpster v. Hetherington

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 4, 1994No. C9-93-787PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

In this slip-and-fall case, the conduct of defendants claimed and found to be negligent was not, as a matter of law, a direct cause of plaintiffs injuries. We reverse the court of appeals’ affirmance of the jury’s verdict.

Mrs. Harpster (the plaintiff) and Mr. and Mrs. Hetherington (the defendants) are good friends and next-door neighbors. About midday on December 17, 1988, Mrs. Harp-ster walked over to the Hetherington house — the two neighbors had keys to each other’s homes — to attend to the Hethering-ton dog. Mrs. Harpster went in through the garage and let the dog out into the fenced-in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kryzer v. Champlin American Legion No. 600Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lubbers v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  2. Wicken v. MorrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  3. Elder v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2004
  4. Bryan v. KissoonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  5. Curtis v. KlauslerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API