Legal Opinion
Kohn v. State Ex Rel. Humphrey
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 15, 1983No. C1-82-1419PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONETT, Justice.
The district court granted the motion of the Minnesota Attorney General on behalf of the state to compel respondents in a civil investigative proceeding to produce business documents and to answer interrogatories, and it denied respondents’ motion for a protective order. Granting discretionary review of the trial court’s order, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.
Minn.Stat. § 8.31 (1982) instructs the Attorney General to investigate violations of the business and trade laws of this state and authorizes discovery without commencement of a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Hannah v. LarcheSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re GlaxoSmithKline PlcSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. NetlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Minnesota Twins Partnership v. State Ex Rel. HatchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- In Re an Inquiry Concerning AgerterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Wilson Corp. v. State Ex Rel. UdallNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.