Legal Opinion
Wilson Corp. v. State Ex Rel. Udall
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided March 19, 1996No. 16484PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARTZ, Judge.
1. Pursuant to the New Mexico Antitrust Act, NMSA 1978, §§ 57-1-1 to -15 (Repl. Pamp.1995), the Attorney General obtained approval from the Santa Fe County District Court for civil investigative demands (CIDs) directed to a number of companies for information regarding the pricing and marketing of gasoline in New Mexico. The requests for the CIDs were granted ex parte. See § 57-1-5(A). After service of the CIDs, some recipients raised challenges in various courts around the state. This is the second appeal to arise from those challenges.
2. The first appeal concerned a…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Evans v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1998
- Gonzales v. New Mexico Department of HealthNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
- Coulston Foundation v. MadridNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
- Gonzales v. New Mexico Department of HealthNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
- N.M. Construction Indus. Div. v. CohenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019