Legal Opinion
In Re an Inquiry Concerning Agerter
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 17, 1984No. CX-83-1350PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Per curiam
The Board on Judicial Standards petitions this court for a writ of prohibition prohibiting the district court from quashing a subpoena compelling a judge to appear before the Board to answer questions about a complaint filed against the judge. We grant the writ in part and deny in part.
On May 23, 1983, the Board on Judicial Standards received a letter from a private citizen claiming, according to the testimony of the Board’s secretary, that Lawrence Agerter, a county judge for Dodge and Olmsted Counties, had an alcohol problem and was having sexual relations with the complainant’s ex-wife.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Nixon v. Administrator of General ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Carey v. Population Services InternationalSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Pollard v. RobertsDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1968
- Nicholson v. State Commission on Judicial ConductNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Medical Arts Clinic, P.C. v. Franciscan Initiatives, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re Charges of Unprofessional Conduct Against N.P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Humenansky v. Minnesota Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Iowa City Human Rights Commission v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1986
- Minneapolis Federation of Teachers v. Minneapolis Public Schools, Special School District No. 1Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.