Legal Opinion
State v. Netland
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 12, 2009No. A06-1511PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILDEA, Justice.
Respondent Jakklyn Netland challenged her conviction for second-degree criminal *205test refusal, arguing that her right to due process was violated by the manner in which the breathalyzer test was administered and that the criminal test-refusal statute violated her right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. Net-land raised the due process issue to the district court, and that court rejected her argument. On appeal, Netland additionally raised the issue that the criminal test-refusal statute violated her right to be free from unreasonable searches and…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- State v. HooverOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. BirchfieldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. McNeelySupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.