Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Minnesota Twins Partnership v. State Ex Rel. Hatch

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 29, 1999No. C9-98-890PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAUL H. ANDERSON, Justice.

We are asked to determine if appellants must comply with civil investigative demands issued by the Minnesota Attorney General’s Office. The Attorney General is requesting information on the proposed sale and relocation of the Minnesota Twins baseball franchise to North Carolina and a potential boycott of Minnesota by Major League Baseball 1 in violation of state antitrust laws. The appellants allege that them conduct is exempt from Minnesota’s antitrust laws because the United States Supreme Court has held that the business of professional baseball is exempt…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Union Labor Life Insurance v. PirenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Radovich v. National Football LeagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Flood v. KuhnSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. In re Relafen Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
  2. Lorix v. Crompton Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  3. In Re Lorazepam & Clorazepate Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against OverboeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  5. Thurmond v. Prince William Professional Baseball Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2003

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API