Legal Opinion
Ficken v. AMR Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 29, 2008No. Civil Action 07-2166 (RMU)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting in Part and Denying in Part the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss; Granting the Plaintiff’s Motion to Toll the Statute of Limitations
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The pro se plaintiff in this action, Ivan Ficken, purports to bring suit on behalf of himself, his adopted son, Ciprian Ivanof, and Ciprian Ivanof s biological father, Isaia Ivanof, against AMR Corporation, three AMR employees, American Airlines, Inc. and AMR Eagle Holding Corporation. The complaint stems from the plaintiffs 1 loss of his Trans World Airlines (“TWA”) frequent flyer miles…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Campbell v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Xereas v. HeissDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Parnigoni v. ST. COLUMBA'S NURSERY SCHOOLDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Myers v. Alutiiq International Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Intelect Corporation v. Cellco Partnership GpDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.