Legal Opinion
Campbell v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 16, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2014-0892PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
From 2000 through 2014, Plaintiff Rita Campbell was enrolled in the HealthExtras benefit program, which purported to provide her with group disability insurance coverage. Ms. Campbell now believes that the policy she paid for was illegal and worthless, and she has brought this putative class action on behalf of herself and similarly situated residents of the District of Columbia against seven companies that she believes contributed to and profited…
2Cases cited83 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- 100reporters LLC v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Krukas v. AARP, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- McMullen v. Synchrony BankDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Hedgeye Risk Management, LLC v. HeldmanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Bradley v. National Collegiate Athletic AssociationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.