Legal Opinion

Intelect Corporation v. Cellco Partnership Gp

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 5, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2015-0902PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Denying Defendants’ Motion to Tkansfer Venue and Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss

RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

In 2009, a consortium of four cellular telephone carriers (collectively “Defendants” or the “Carrier Consortium”), 1 entered into a Master License Agreement with the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMATA”) for the design and construction of a wireless communications infrastructure that would allow WMATA riders' to use their cellular phones in Metrorail tunnels and stations. In this…

2Cases cited103 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasa Federal Credit UnionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  2. Krukas v. AARP, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  3. Kumar, ph.D. v. George Washington UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  4. United States Ex Rel. Westrick v. Second Chance Body Armor, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  5. Vantage Commodities Fin. Servs. I, LLC v. Assured Risk Transfer PCC, LLCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API