Legal Opinion

Mann v. Mann

California Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1907No. Sac. No. 1406PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

This action was brought to recover possession of a parcel of land situate in Tuolumne County. The plaintiff recovered judgment declaring that he was the owner and entitled to possession of the premises. The defendants appeal from the judgment and from an order denying their motion for a new trial.

The land in question is a portion of the northeast quarter of the southwest quarter of section 15, township 1 north, range 14 east. On February 1, 1882, a United States patent was issued to Thomas Sayre for certain land which included said northeast quarter of the southwest quarter of section 15.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Helm v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Lewis v. OgramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. White v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Dierssen v. NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Clapp v. ChurchillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Sorensen v. CostaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Mello v. WeaverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Silva v. AzevedoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Gilardi v. HallamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API