Legal Opinion

White v. Spreckels

California Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1888No. 9921PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Cruz County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSbabls, C. J.

This is an action of ejectment to recover a strip of land about two and one eighth miles in length, and of about one hundred feet in width, as well as a certain other piece of land containing about four acres.

Plaintiff had judgment for restitution and for $86.62, the value of the use and occupation of the premises, and for costs. Defendant appeals from the judgment, and from an order denying a new trial.

Plaintiff is the owner of the Calabasas rancho, and defendant is the owner of the Aptos rancho, which lies west of and adjoins the former.

The question involved relates to the division line…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sneed v. OsbornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Bolton v. LannTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Columbet v. PachecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Cooper v. VierraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Moyle v. ConnollyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Young v. BlakemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Price v. De ReyesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Helm v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Lewis v. OgramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Loustalot v. McKeelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API