Legal Opinion
Bankers Trust of California, N.A. v. Neal
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 3, 2001No. AC 20439PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
O’CONNELL, J.
In 1998, Bankers Trust of California, N.A. (Bankers Trust), commenced an action against the defendants, Retha M. Neal and Charles Neal, Jr., to foreclose an $85,700 mortgage on property that the Neals owned in New Haven.1 Also named as defendants were Joshua Hecht and Bluma Hecht, who held a $20,000 purchase money second mortgage on the prem*156ises. Because the Neals did not participate in this action, we refer to the Hechts as the defendants.
The defendants claim that the trial court improperly rendered judgment (1) without an evidentiary hearing on the amended complaint and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. NardiniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- New England Savings Bank v. Bedford Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Jacobson v. RobingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. BomberoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Dime Savings Bank v. ArpaiaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Anderson v. BursonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Urbanowicz v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Lucas v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Webster Trust v. Mardie Lane Homes, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. KhatunConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013