Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Bombero
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 17, 1995No. 12074PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
The defendant, a judgment lienholder who was mistakenly omitted from foreclosure proceed*765ings brought by the plaintiff’s predecessor, appeals from the trial court’s granting of the plaintiff’s application to discharge cash held in escrow, which had been substituted for the defendant’s judgment lien.
The defendant argues that the trial court should not have granted the plaintiff’s application because (1) there is no cause of action allowing the plaintiff to bring such an application, and (2) even if there was such a cause of action, the trial court improperly found that the defendant’s lien was…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Watts v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Normand Josef Enterprises, Inc. v. Connecticut National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Kakalik v. BernardoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- State v. ZayasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- New England Savings Bank v. LopezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Southbridge Associates, LLC v. GarofaloConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Beebe v. Town of East HaddamConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. BomberoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Lucas v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.