Legal Opinion
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Khatun
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 5, 2013No. AC 34595PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*619 Opinion
2Per curiam
The defendant, Amena Khatun, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying her motion to open the judgment of strict foreclosure. On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court abused its discretion by denying her motion to open the judgment and extend the law day. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
On May 16, 2008, the defendant signed a note in the amount of $405,000 secured by a mortgage encumbering 6 Mulvoy Street in Norwalk. The defendant defaulted on the note, and the plaintiff, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., the holder of the note, accelerated payment and called…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Hamm v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Ral Management, Inc. v. Valley View AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Franklin Credit Management Corp. v. NicholasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. FrimbergerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Bankers Trust of California, N.A. v. NealConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
4Cited by1 opinion
- U.S. Bank, N.A., Trustee v. MorawskaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016