Legal Opinion
State v. Nardini
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 11, 1982PublishedCited by 126 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtParskey, J.
This appeal by the state challenges the constitutionality of the Connecticut Sentence Eeview Act. General Statutes §§ 51-194 through 51-197. Having examined the grounds of this challenge and having found them wanting, we affirm the constitutionality of the act.
This case arises out of action by the sentence review division reducing the sentence originally imposed on the defendant. After a jury trial the defendant was found guilty of conspiracy to commit arson; General Statutes § 53a-48; and the substantive crime of arson in the first degree. General Statutes § 53a-111 (a) (1) and (2). He was…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by126 opinions
- Pamela B. v. MentSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. DeJesusSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.