Woodson v. Rowland
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
Plaintiff presents four issues on appeal. She first argues that Rowland Utility’s actions in violating certain Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) safety regulations were so grossly negligent as to amount to an intentional assault on her decedent. She next argues that Rowland’s individual actions were those of a co-employee rather than Sprouse’s employer. She further contends that both D & J and Pinnacle breached a non-delegable duty by allowing Rowland Utility’s negligence in failing to maintain a safe work place while performing an inherently dangerous…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hogan v. Forsyth Country Club Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Page v. SloanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Pleasant v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Ladonna Anderson as of the Estate of Donald Anderson v. Marathon Petroleum Company, F/k/a Marathon Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Hicks v. Guilford CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Dunleavy v. YATES CONST. CO., INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- Best v. Energized Substation Service, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Cook v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- Dunleavy v. Yates Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- Young v. Bob Howard Automotive, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.