Legal Opinion
Best v. Energized Substation Service, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 2, 1993No. 92CA005457PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Reece, Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant, Gregory L. Best, appeals the trial court’s decision granting summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee, Dayton Power & Light Company (“Dayton Power”), on Best’s claims of negligence, strict liability and statutory violations. We affirm.
Best was an employee of Energized Substation Service, Inc. (“ESS”), a company that specializes in painting electrical substations. In February 1989, Dayton Power contracted with ESS to paint a substation in Vandalia, Ohio. Best was assigned to work at the Vandalia substation. According to Best’s depositions, he understood…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
- Mitseff v. WheelerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Mers v. Dispatch Printing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Camargo v. Tjaarda DairyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Carney v. Union Pacific R.R. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2017
- Conte v. General Housewares Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- McConville v. Jackson Comfort Systems, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Frost v. Dayton Power and Light CompanyOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.