Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Guilford County

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 25, 1966No. 703PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLake, J.

A person who seeks to recover benefits under the Workmen’s Compensation Act must prove that he is a member of a class embraced in the Act. Richards v. Nationwide Homes, 263 N.C. 295, 139 S.E. 2d 645. The Act applies only where the employer-employee relationship exists. Hayes v. Elon College, 224 N.C. 11, 29 S.E. 2d 137. The question of whether this relationship existed at the time of the claimant’s injury is jurisdictional and, therefore, the finding or conclusion of the Industrial Commission with respect thereto is not conclusive but is reviewable by the court on appeal. Askew v. Tire Co.,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hayes v. . Elon CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  2. Hayes v. Board of Trustees of Elon CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  3. Vause v. Vause Farm Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Taylor v. Twin City ClubSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Askew v. LEONARD TIRE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Woodson v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Wood v. Guilford CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  3. Pleasant v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Lucas v. Li'l General StoresSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. Vaughn v. North Carolina Department of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API