Legal Opinion

Marsch v. Williams

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 15, 1994No. D018378PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BENKE, J.

In this appeal, defendant Ronald Williams and entities he controls (unless otherwise indicated, collectively Williams) appeal an order denying their petition to compel arbitration of claims brought against them by plaintiff and respondent Nicolas Marsch III. Because Marsch’s claims are not related to or grow out of any agreement which provides for arbitration, we affirm the order denying Williams’s petition to compel arbitration.

Factual Background

La Jolla

In 1973, long before Marsch had entered any relationship with Williams, Marsch and Willis Short formed the La Jolla…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Berman v. Dean Witter & Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Chan v. Drexel Burnham Lambert, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Izzi v. Mesquite Country ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Boys Club of San Fernando Valley, Inc. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. County of Contra Costa v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1996
  2. Young Seok Suh v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. Marsch v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Garrison v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. Young v. Horizon West, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API