Ericksen, Arbuthnot, McCarthy, Kearney & Walsh, Inc. v. 100 Oak Street
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRODIN, J.
The question presented here is whether a party to an agreement which includes an arbitration clause may bypass the arbitral process, and invoke the jurisdiction of the courts, by asserting that the agreement itself was the product of fraud. We conclude, in accord with the United States Supreme Court and the overwhelming majority of state courts which have considered the question, that the arbitration commitment is severable from the underlying agreement and that where, as in this case, the arbitration clause may reasonably be construed to encompass the fraud claim, the entire…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Robert Lawrence Company, Inc. v. Devonshire Fabrics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Graham v. Scissor-Tail, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by122 opinions
- Engalla v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Rosenthal v. Great Western Financial Securities Corp.California Supreme Court · 1996
- Saint Agnes Medical Center v. PacifiCare of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Haworth v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.