Legal Opinion

Fagelbaum & Heller LLP v. Smylie

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 2, 2009No. B205181PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAUER, J. *

INTRODUCTION

Appellant Robert O. Smylie (Smylie) appeals from a judgment confirming an arbitration award which resolved a dispute over legal fees and costs incurred in two prior lawsuits. He contends that the court should have stayed the lawsuit filed by respondent law firm, Fagelbaum & Heller LLP (F&H), until the completion of the nonbinding arbitration Smylie initiated pursuant to the mandatory fee arbitration act (MFAA), Business and Professions Code section 6200 et seq. Smylie also contends that the court should have stayed the contractual arbitration initiated by F&H…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Aguilar v. LernerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Abramson v. Juniper Networks, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. Flores v. Evergreen at San Diego, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Pinnacle Museum Tower Ass'n v. Pinnacle Market Development (US), LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Peleg v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. Giorgianni v. CrowleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. Martini E Ricci Lamino S.P.A.-Consortile Societa Agricola v. Trinity Fruit Sales Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2014
  5. Rosenson v. Greenberg Glusker Fields Claman & Machtinger LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API