Legal Opinion
Ikerd v. Warren T. Merrill & Sons
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 6, 1992No. B059236PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, J.
In this case, the trial court, before finally signing a judgment confirming an arbitration award, modified the designation of the party against whom the award was made, from an individual to a corporation. The appellant, Lloyd Ikerd (Ikerd), appeals from such corrected judgment which modified the award so that it was only against respondent Warren T. Merrill & Sons, Inc. (WTMS), and not against Warren T. Merrill (Merrill), individually. The sole ground for the court’s ruling was that there was never any personal jurisdiction over Merrill.
As we are satisfied that this record…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bronco Wine Co. v. Frank A. Logoluso FarmsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Fazzi v. PetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Cobler v. Stanley, Barber, Southard, Brown & AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Rojes v. Riverside General HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Tate v. Saratoga Savings & Loan Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Pierotti v. TorianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Woodlawn Park Ltd. v. Doster Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- August Entertainment, Inc. v. Philadelphia Indemnity InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Benaroya v. Willis, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Boyer v. JensenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.