Legal Opinion

Panopulos v. Maderis

California Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1956No. S. F. 19514; S. F. 19515; S. F. 19516; S. F. 19517PublishedCited by 132 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

These are appeals by the plaintiffs Amelia Panopulos, Catherine Fitts, Beatrice Schunke and Elizabeth Hodenson from judgments on verdicts for the defendant Gussie Maderis in four separate actions for personal injuries arising out of an automobile accident which occurred while the plaintiffs were riding in the defendant’s automobile. The causes were consolidated and tried together.

The plaintiffs and another lady accompanied the defendant in her automobile from San Jose to Mountain View where they attended a public card party, as they had done on other occasions. On the return trip Mrs. Fitts…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ernst v. SearleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. McCann v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Prager v. IsrealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Ruel v. LangelierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  5. Gibson Properties Co. v. City of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by132 opinions

  1. Ward v. TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Johnson v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  3. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  4. San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Christina N.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. Carmichael v. ReitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API