Legal Opinion

Miranda v. 21st Century Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 13, 2004No. G031774PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

IKOLA, J.

The court dismissed plaintiff Daphne Miranda’s underinsured motorist arbitration because she refused to obey a prior discovery order. Plaintiff contends the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to dismiss the arbitration proceeding, and also lacked personal jurisdiction to make any orders against her. In the alternative, plaintiff contends the court abused its discretion by imposing a terminating sanction without first imposing a lesser sanction. We disagree with all of plaintiff’s arguments and affirm the judgment of dismissal.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 1

On…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. People v. PietersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. In Re WilliamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Garcia v. McCutchenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Freeman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Mercury Insurance Group v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Doppes v. Bentley Motors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. O'GRADY v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. Dep't of Forestry & Fire Prot. v. Howell, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  4. Padron v. Watchtower Bible & Tract Soc'y of N.Y., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  5. Negro v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API