Heier v. Krull
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sutter County. K. S. Mahon, Judge. ,The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The defendants appeal from a judgment in
favor of plaintiff.
The object of plaintiff’s suit was to enjoin the defendants from enlarging Old Live Oak Slough and from constructing or maintaining a certain proposed ditch, and from doing any other act or thing whereby any of the waters falling upon the lands northeasterly of a certain alleged ridge, some six miles northerly of plaintiff’s lands, might be precipitated, or the flow thereof accelerated, to or upon the plaintiff’s lands. He also asks for a mandatory injunction requiring defendants to fill up so much of said ditch as had been dug before…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hicks v. DrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- McDaniel v. CummingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Conniff v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Wood v. MoultonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Rudel v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- San Gabriel Valley Country Club v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Lebrun v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Keys v. RomleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Horton v. GoodenoughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Sturges v. Charles L. Harney, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1958
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.