Legal Opinion

Commercial Bank of Santa Ana v. Pritchard

California Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1899No. L.A. No. 695PublishedCited by 17 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County and from an order denying a new trial. J. W. Ballard, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

COOPER, C.

—Action for foreclosure of mortgage. Judgment for defendant McKelvey. Motion for a new trial denied and plaintiff appeals from the judgment and order.

The facts of this case are substantially as follows: On May 25, 1895, the Southern California Railway Company leased a small parcel of land, described by metes and bounds, to one Pritchard for the term of five years from the date of said lease, at the nominal rent of one dollar per year, for the exclusive purpose of a warehouse site. The lease provided that it might be terminated by either party upon thirty days’ notice in writing,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lavenson v. Standard Soap Co.California Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Warnock v. HarlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Garber v. GianellaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Bank of Ukiah v. Petaluma Sav. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Griffin v. Marine Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1869

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Trabue Pittman Corp. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Schonfeld v. City of VallejoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. San Pedro, L.A. & Salt Lake R.R. v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. R. Barcroft & Sons Co. v. CullenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Continental Supply Co. v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API