Legal Opinion

Lavenson v. Standard Soap Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1889No. 11609PublishedCited by 38 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Gibson, C.

Action on the case for damages suffered by the impairment of a mortgage security. Judgment for plaintiff, from which, and an order denying a new trial, defendants appeal.

The complaint shows that the plaintiff had from the *246Mege Pacific Commercial Company, one of the defendants, a properly executed and recorded mortgage upon the realty therein described; that the other defendant, knowing this fact, with the said mortgagor, dug up, detached, and remp.ved certain fixtures, permanently attached to ¡the realty, well -knowing that such severance and removal would impair and render…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Van Pelt v. . McGrawNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  2. Gardner v. HearttNew York Supreme Court · 1846
  3. Yates v. JoyceNew York Supreme Court · 1814
  4. Buckout v. SwiftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  5. Mascarel v. RaffourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Cornelison v. KornbluthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. San Diego Trust & Savings Bank v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. City of Los Angeles v. KlinkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. U. S. Financial v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. Gosliner v. BrionesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API