R. Barcroft & Sons Co. v. Cullen
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Defendant Pacific Steel Building Company appeals from a judgment foreclosing plaintiff’s mechanic’s lien. The trial court imposed the lien on certain buildings located on the property, as well as on the real estate. The sole contention on this appeal is that the buildings are personal property belonging to appellant, and, as such, are not subject to the lien of the plaintiff. The facts giving rise to this controversy are not materially in dispute, and are as follows:
Sometime in April, 1928, the owners of certain real property, the defendants Thorington, leased the same to the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Gosliner v. BrionesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Merritt & Bourne v. Judd & ByrneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Northwestern Lumber & Wrecking Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Oakland Bank of Savings v. California Pressed Brick Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Bianchi v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Trabue Pittman Corp. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- M. P. Moller, Inc. v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Concrete Service Co. v. State of California Ex Rel. Dept. Pub. Wks.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Renner v. Huntington Etc. Oil & Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
- Seatrain Terminals of California, Inc. v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.