Warnock v. Harlow
California Supreme Court
• Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court oí Sacramento County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Haynes, C.
— On May 4, 1881, W. W. Brison was the owner of the lands described in the complaint, and on that day conveyed the same to his wife, Carrie M. Brison. On September 15, 1886, W. W. Brison commenced an action against his wife, the object of which was to obtain a decree declaring that she held the title to said lands in trust for himself, and to compel a reconveyance, and at the same time filed a Us pendens in the recorder’s office.
On November 22, 1888, a decree was entered in said cause, requiring Mrs. Brison to execute such conveyance within ten days, and in default thereof,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hoag v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Head v. FordyceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Collingwood v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Hoyt v. JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
- Utley v. FeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Bell v. PleasantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Tillaux v. TillauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Moore v. SchneiderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Domarad v. Fisher & Burke, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Hancock Oil Co. v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.