Legal Opinion

Bank of Ukiah v. Petaluma Sav. Bank

California Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1893No. 15022PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sonoma County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Temple, C.

Appeal from the judgment. A simple question of law is presented by this appeal. The learned judge of the trial court, in an opinion which respondent has printed in his brief, presents that question thus: “Will the lien of an unrecorded mortgage, given to secure a loan, take precedence over an attachment or judgment lien obtained after the execution of the mortgage ? There is no law in this state which requires conveyances to be recorded. Section 1217 of the Civil Code provides that ‘an unrecorded instrument is *591valid as between the parties thereto and those who have notice thereof.’…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Root, Neilson & Co. v. BryantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Walker v. BuffandeauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Whitney v. ShermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Depner v. Joseph Zukin BlousesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Commercial Bank of Santa Ana v. PritchardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Murphy v. Plankinton BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Boye v. BoernerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API