Legal Opinion

Giometti v. Etienne

California Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1936No. L. A. 15409PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

Motion to dismiss upon the ground that the judgment appealed from has been satisfied and- the issues have become moot.

It appears that the parties hereto entered into a contract by the terms of which the defendant and respondent undertook to construct an ice plant on certain real property, the record title to which stood in respondent’s name. Respondent erected the building and installed the necessary machinery and equipment and appellants went into possession. Subsequently respondent gave notice to the appellants that they had defaulted in their payments and had breached the contract. Based…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. County of San Bernardino v. County of RiversideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Preluzsky v. Pacific Co-Operative Cafeteria Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Buckeye Refining Co. v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Warner Bros. Co. v. FreudCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Burgess v. California Mutual Building & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Schubert v. ReichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Lee v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Mathys v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Swallers v. SwallersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Wilson v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API