Legal Opinion

Preluzsky v. Pacific Co-Operative Cafeteria Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1925No. Docket No. L.A. 8345PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal npon the ground that the judgment appealed from has been fully satisfied and the appeal thereby rendered moot. Plaintiff recovered judgment in an action for the specific performance of a contract whereby the defendant agreed to sell and assign to the plaintiff a certain lease and leasehold estate at the price of twenty-five thousand dollars, of which one hundred dollars was paid upon the execution of the contract, and the balance of twenty-four thousand nine hundred dollars, was to be paid within ninety days thereafter. Plaintiff having tendered…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Estate of ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Warner Bros. Co. v. FreudCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Kenney v. ParksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Knight v. MarksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Turner v. MarkhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Gudelj v. GudeljCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Frustuck v. City of FairfaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Miller v. National American Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Templeton Feed & Grain v. Ralston Purina Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Mears v. MearsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API