County of San Bernardino v. County of Riverside
California Supreme Court
MOTION to dismiss appeals from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County directing payment of money as a condition of setting aside a judgment by default, and from an order making the conditional order absolute. M. T. Allen, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. J. W. Curtis, District Attorney of San Bernardino County, and Otis & Gregg, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
Motion to dismiss the appeals.
Judgment herein was entered by default against the defendant, March 14, 1901, and on April 5, 1901, the superior court set the default and judgment aside upon the ground that they had been entered through the mistake, inadvertence, surprise, and excusable neglect of the defendant, but ordered, as a condition for setting the same aside, that the defendant pay to the plaintiff two hundred and fifty dollars as for costs and expenses. The defendant complied with this condition, and paid' the said sum of money to the plaintiff, and upon a proper showing thereof the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Storke v. StorkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Shaver v. TunsteadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Ind. Dist. v. Dist. Tp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1876
- Smith v. ColemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
- Cogswell v. ColleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1867
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- H. D. Arnaiz Ltd. v. County of San JoaquinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Schubert v. ReichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- In Re Estate of HubbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Patterson v. KeeneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Lee v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.