Legal Opinion

Burgess v. California Mutual Building & Loan Ass'n

California Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1930No. Docket No. S.F. 12954PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

That portion of the opinion of the Honorable District Court of Appeal which contains a statement of the issues involved, as well as its disposition of the motion to dismiss the appeal, is hereby adopted as a portion of the opinion of this court herein, as follows:

“On the 9th day of October, 1924, one Daniel McKillop and Josephine McKillop, his wife, executed a deed of trust, in which the respondent California Mutual Building and Loan Association was the beneficiary, to secure a promissory note in the sum of $20,000, and also future advances which said respondent should make to said McKillop,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. MowrySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. National Hardware Co. v. SherwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Preluzsky v. Pacific Co-Operative Cafeteria Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Warner Bros. Co. v. FreudCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Kenney v. ParksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Graham-Sult v. ClainosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. Reitano v. YankwichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Chesus v. WattsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Lee v. Paragon Group Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Aronowicz v. Nalley's, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1972

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API