Schubert v. Reich
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.
Plaintiff commenced an action with respect to a contract under which defendant was to grade and process dates owned by plaintiff. Defendant answered and cross-complained for compensation for grading work, and obtained a judgment for $7,287.16, and a declaration that he had a lien on the dates as security. Plaintiff’s motion for a new trial on the ground of accident and surprise was granted “on the condition that the plaintiff and cross-defendant pay to Clyde Thomas, attorney for the defendant and cross-complainant, the sum of $75.00 as attorney fees within 5 days.” Apparently the condition of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- County of San Bernardino v. County of RiversideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- In Re Estate of HubbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Preluzsky v. Pacific Co-Operative Cafeteria Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
- Storke v. StorkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Shaver v. TunsteadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Gudelj v. GudeljCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- In Re Marriage of FonsteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Frustuck v. City of FairfaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- H. D. Arnaiz Ltd. v. County of San JoaquinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Mears v. MearsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.