Warner Bros. Co. v. Freud
California Supreme Court
MOTION to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Edward A. Belcher, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The respondent moves to dismiss the appeal upon -the ground “that after the taking of said appeal the appellant, Tiny Freud, administratrix with the will annexed of the estate of Morris Freud, deceased, voluntarily paid to the respondent, and the respondent accepted, the whole sum of money specified in the decree appealed from, thus effecting a satisfaction of said decree.”
The motion is made upon the transcript and an affidavit showing that on August 12, 1899, said administratrix paid to the respondent twelve thousand two hundred and nine dollars and sixty-seven cents for the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Erwin v. LowrySupreme Court of the United States · 1849
- O'Hara v. MacConnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- In re Estate of BabyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Hayes v. . NourseNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Morton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Reitano v. YankwichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Levin v. SaroffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Preluzsky v. Pacific Co-Operative Cafeteria Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
- Buckeye Refining Co. v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Burgess v. California Mutual Building & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.