Legal Opinion

Buckeye Refining Co. v. Kelly

California Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1912No. L.A. No. 2879PublishedCited by 33 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

Appeal by plaintiff from an order directing entry of satisfaction of judgment.

The action was commenced in September, 1906, to recover damages against Kelly, the sheriff of Kern County, and the sureties on his official bond, for the wrongful seizure by said Kelly, under a writ of attachment against the property of third persons, of personal property belonging to the plaintiff. On February 9, 1909, a judgment for three thousand dollars with interest and costs, was entered in favor of the plaintiff and against the sheriff and his sureties. On April 9, 1909, the defendants appealed from the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Grain v. AldrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Bell v. PleasantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Burnett v. CrandallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  4. Skelly v. Westminster School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Warner Bros. Co. v. FreudCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Gulf Production Co. v. Continental Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Redevelopment Agency v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Hellman Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. AldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Reitano v. YankwichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Hartke v. AbbottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API