State v. Rider
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRosenblum, J.
Defendant appeals from a conviction for one count of first-degree burglary. ORS 164.225. Much of the evidence at defendant’s trial was the product of a search that defendant consented to after the police had initiated a check to see if defendant had any outstanding warrants. Before trial, defendant unsuccessfully moved to suppress that evidence. He argues on appeal that he was unlawfully stopped during the warrant check and that his consent to the search and the evidence derived therefrom were products of exploitation of the unlawful stop. The state concedes that the police did not have…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. WoodallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- State v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- State v. AtkinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. HighleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. AylesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. LayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- State v. BroughtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.