Legal Opinion

State v. Atkin

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 5, 2003No. C992235CR; A114082PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

Defendant was convicted on stipulated facts of possession of a controlled substance. On appeal, she assigns error to the denial of her motion to suppress evidence. We affirm.

Hillsboro Police Officer Chrz saw a car with expired tags pull into a parking lot. In the process of investigating for a possible vehicle registration violation, Chrz discovered that the driver of the car had a suspended license and was wanted on a felony warrant in Multnomah County. Chrz decided to arrest the driver, inventory and impound his car, and confine him to the back seat of the patrol car. By that time,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. RodriguezOregon Supreme Court · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. RiderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  2. State v. HolcombCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. State v. HiteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. State v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  5. State v. MeharryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API