Legal Opinion

State v. Harper

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 2, 2005No. 0003315CR; A118880PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, C. J.

A jury convicted defendant of possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(4). Before trial, defendant filed a motion to suppress statements that he made during an encounter with police and evidence seized at his home. The trial court denied the motion, ruling that the encounter was not a stop and that the evidence found in defendant’s residence was seized under a valid search warrant. On appeal, defendant first argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress because the police unlawfully stopped him and the search warrant was issued, in part, based on statements that…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. WarnerOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. LowryOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. VillagranOregon Supreme Court · 1983

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. AshbaughCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. State v. NyceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. RiderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  4. State v. KolbCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API